TSTP Solution File: SEV245^6 by Satallax---3.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Satallax---3.5
% Problem  : SEV245^6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 18:05:33 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.36s
% Output   : Proof 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   42
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   52 (  14 unt;   5 typ;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  115 (   1 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  261 (  57   ~;  16   |;   0   &; 113   @)
%                                         (  15 <=>;  60  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   25 (  25   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   22 (  20 usr;  19 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   60 (   9   ^  51   !;   0   ?;  60   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(ty_a,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(ty_eigen__2,type,
    eigen__2: a ).

thf(ty_eigen__1,type,
    eigen__1: a > $o ).

thf(ty_eigen__0,type,
    eigen__0: a ).

thf(ty_cK,type,
    cK: ( a > $o ) > a > $o ).

thf(h0,assumption,
    ! [X1: a > $o,X2: a] :
      ( ( X1 @ X2 )
     => ( X1 @ ( eps__0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(eigendef_eigen__2,definition,
    ( eigen__2
    = ( eps__0
      @ ^ [X1: a] :
          ~ ( ( eigen__1 @ X1 )
           => ~ ! [X2: a > $o] :
                  ( ! [X3: a] :
                      ( ( X2 @ X3 )
                     => ( cK @ X2 @ X3 ) )
                 => ~ ( X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[eigen__2])]) ).

thf(sP1,plain,
    ( sP1
  <=> ( eigen__1 @ eigen__0 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP1])]) ).

thf(sP2,plain,
    ( sP2
  <=> ( eigen__1 @ eigen__2 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP2])]) ).

thf(sP3,plain,
    ( sP3
  <=> ( cK @ eigen__1 @ eigen__0 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP3])]) ).

thf(sP4,plain,
    ( sP4
  <=> ( sP1
     => sP3 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP4])]) ).

thf(sP5,plain,
    ( sP5
  <=> ! [X1: a > $o] :
        ( ! [X2: a] :
            ( ( X1 @ X2 )
           => ( cK @ X1 @ X2 ) )
       => ~ ( X1 @ eigen__2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP5])]) ).

thf(sP6,plain,
    ( sP6
  <=> ( sP3
     => ( cK
        @ ^ [X1: a] :
            ~ ! [X2: a > $o] :
                ( ! [X3: a] :
                    ( ( X2 @ X3 )
                   => ( cK @ X2 @ X3 ) )
               => ~ ( X2 @ X1 ) )
        @ eigen__0 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP6])]) ).

thf(sP7,plain,
    ( sP7
  <=> ! [X1: a > $o] :
        ( ! [X2: a] :
            ( ( eigen__1 @ X2 )
           => ( X1 @ X2 ) )
       => ! [X2: a] :
            ( ( cK @ eigen__1 @ X2 )
           => ( cK @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP7])]) ).

thf(sP8,plain,
    ( sP8
  <=> ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( eigen__1 @ X1 )
       => ( cK @ eigen__1 @ X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP8])]) ).

thf(sP9,plain,
    ( sP9
  <=> ( cK
      @ ^ [X1: a] :
          ~ ! [X2: a > $o] :
              ( ! [X3: a] :
                  ( ( X2 @ X3 )
                 => ( cK @ X2 @ X3 ) )
             => ~ ( X2 @ X1 ) )
      @ eigen__0 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP9])]) ).

thf(sP10,plain,
    ( sP10
  <=> ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( eigen__1 @ X1 )
       => ~ ! [X2: a > $o] :
              ( ! [X3: a] :
                  ( ( X2 @ X3 )
                 => ( cK @ X2 @ X3 ) )
             => ~ ( X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP10])]) ).

thf(sP11,plain,
    ( sP11
  <=> ( sP8
     => ~ sP2 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP11])]) ).

thf(sP12,plain,
    ( sP12
  <=> ( sP10
     => ! [X1: a] :
          ( ( cK @ eigen__1 @ X1 )
         => ( cK
            @ ^ [X2: a] :
                ~ ! [X3: a > $o] :
                    ( ! [X4: a] :
                        ( ( X3 @ X4 )
                       => ( cK @ X3 @ X4 ) )
                   => ~ ( X3 @ X2 ) )
            @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP12])]) ).

thf(sP13,plain,
    ( sP13
  <=> ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( cK @ eigen__1 @ X1 )
       => ( cK
          @ ^ [X2: a] :
              ~ ! [X3: a > $o] :
                  ( ! [X4: a] :
                      ( ( X3 @ X4 )
                     => ( cK @ X3 @ X4 ) )
                 => ~ ( X3 @ X2 ) )
          @ X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP13])]) ).

thf(sP14,plain,
    ( sP14
  <=> ! [X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( X1 @ X3 )
           => ( X2 @ X3 ) )
       => ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( cK @ X1 @ X3 )
           => ( cK @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP14])]) ).

thf(sP15,plain,
    ( sP15
  <=> ( sP2
     => ~ sP5 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP15])]) ).

thf(cTHM116_2S,conjecture,
    ( sP14
   => ! [X1: a] :
        ( ~ ! [X2: a > $o] :
              ( ! [X3: a] :
                  ( ( X2 @ X3 )
                 => ( cK @ X2 @ X3 ) )
             => ~ ( X2 @ X1 ) )
       => ( cK
          @ ^ [X2: a] :
              ~ ! [X3: a > $o] :
                  ( ! [X4: a] :
                      ( ( X3 @ X4 )
                     => ( cK @ X3 @ X4 ) )
                 => ~ ( X3 @ X2 ) )
          @ X1 ) ) ) ).

thf(h1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( sP14
     => ! [X1: a] :
          ( ~ ! [X2: a > $o] :
                ( ! [X3: a] :
                    ( ( X2 @ X3 )
                   => ( cK @ X2 @ X3 ) )
               => ~ ( X2 @ X1 ) )
         => ( cK
            @ ^ [X2: a] :
                ~ ! [X3: a > $o] :
                    ( ! [X4: a] :
                        ( ( X3 @ X4 )
                       => ( cK @ X3 @ X4 ) )
                   => ~ ( X3 @ X2 ) )
            @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM116_2S]) ).

thf(h2,assumption,
    sP14,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h3,assumption,
    ~ ! [X1: a] :
        ( ~ ! [X2: a > $o] :
              ( ! [X3: a] :
                  ( ( X2 @ X3 )
                 => ( cK @ X2 @ X3 ) )
             => ~ ( X2 @ X1 ) )
       => ( cK
          @ ^ [X2: a] :
              ~ ! [X3: a > $o] :
                  ( ! [X4: a] :
                      ( ( X3 @ X4 )
                     => ( cK @ X3 @ X4 ) )
                 => ~ ( X3 @ X2 ) )
          @ X1 ) ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h4,assumption,
    ~ ( ~ ! [X1: a > $o] :
            ( ! [X2: a] :
                ( ( X1 @ X2 )
               => ( cK @ X1 @ X2 ) )
           => ~ ( X1 @ eigen__0 ) )
     => sP9 ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h5,assumption,
    ~ ! [X1: a > $o] :
        ( ! [X2: a] :
            ( ( X1 @ X2 )
           => ( cK @ X1 @ X2 ) )
       => ~ ( X1 @ eigen__0 ) ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h6,assumption,
    ~ sP9,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h7,assumption,
    ~ ( sP8
     => ~ sP1 ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h8,assumption,
    sP8,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h9,assumption,
    sP1,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(1,plain,
    ( ~ sP5
    | sP11 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).

thf(2,plain,
    ( ~ sP11
    | ~ sP8
    | ~ sP2 ),
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ( sP15
    | sP5 ),
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ( sP15
    | sP2 ),
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ( sP10
    | ~ sP15 ),
    inference(eigen_choice_rule,[status(thm),assumptions([h0])],[h0,eigendef_eigen__2]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ( ~ sP7
    | sP12 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ( ~ sP12
    | ~ sP10
    | sP13 ),
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ( ~ sP13
    | sP6 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ( ~ sP6
    | ~ sP3
    | sP9 ),
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ( ~ sP14
    | sP7 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ( ~ sP8
    | sP4 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ( ~ sP4
    | ~ sP1
    | sP3 ),
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_unsat,[status(thm),assumptions([h8,h9,h7,h5,h6,h4,h2,h3,h1,h0])],[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,h2,h8,h9,h6]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h7,h5,h6,h4,h2,h3,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h8,h9])],[h7,13,h8,h9]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h5,h6,h4,h2,h3,h1,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h7]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__1)],[h5,14,h7]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h4,h2,h3,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h5,h6])],[h4,15,h5,h6]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h2,h3,h1,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h4]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__0)],[h3,16,h4]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h2,h3])],[h1,17,h2,h3]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    $false,
    inference(eigenvar_choice,[status(thm),assumptions([h1]),eigenvar_choice(discharge,[h0])],[18,h0]) ).

thf(0,theorem,
    ( sP14
   => ! [X1: a] :
        ( ~ ! [X2: a > $o] :
              ( ! [X3: a] :
                  ( ( X2 @ X3 )
                 => ( cK @ X2 @ X3 ) )
             => ~ ( X2 @ X1 ) )
       => ( cK
          @ ^ [X2: a] :
              ~ ! [X3: a > $o] :
                  ( ! [X4: a] :
                      ( ( X3 @ X4 )
                     => ( cK @ X3 @ X4 ) )
                 => ~ ( X3 @ X2 ) )
          @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(contra,[status(thm),contra(discharge,[h1])],[18,h1]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEV245^6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.1.0.
% 0.12/0.12  % Command  : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun 28 10:33:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.36  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.36  % Mode: mode213
% 0.19/0.36  % Inferences: 33
% 0.19/0.36  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------